Archive for March, 2010

…It Must Be A Constitutional Amendment

. . .  It must be a Constitutional Amendment, the voice of the people, and inviolable; it must limit government’s ability to live above its means, and it must limit the size of government relative to the economy. It is unconscionable that our generation would leave a legacy of profligacy and...
Read More

A Balanced-Budget Amendment to the Constitution

Opponents of a Balanced-Budget Amendment to the Constitution usually complain that it would not pass muster at the Supreme Court, because most proposals would have the President or the courts step in to balance the budget if the Congress failed---and only Congress has the power of the purse.  However, there...
Read More

A Limitation On Federal Spending, to 20% of GDP

The federal government should be limited to 20% of the national economy every year. From the Wall Street Journal, "Time for a Spending Cap With Teeth"   by Congressmen Jeb Hensarling and Mike Pence "Fiscal storm clouds are upon us. In five years, federal spending has skyrocketed to 24.7% from 19.9% of our...
Read More

A Pledge of Fiscal Responsibility

For candidates for federal office: I pledge that, if elected, I will introduce legislation to establish: A balanced budget amendment to the Constitution, with appropriate exceptions for times of war and recession. A line-item veto, to give the President a fighting chance to eliminate pork and earmarks. Term Limits, of any durations...
Read More

Constituents Calling

"If interest rates are at 10% when the net federal debt hits $10 trillion (roughly two years from now), we will find ourselves paying $1 trillion per year in interest.” "Interest would vault over medical care to become the largest item in the federal budget.  $1 trillion is $8,547 per household,...
Read More